aes24 International Evaluation Conference

Authors: Charlie Tulloch (Policy Performance)

Many people will be attending their first AES conference - welcome!
This workshop is targeted at new and emerging evaluators who are seeking to build their familiarity with the key concepts and language used in evaluation and the main elements of evaluation project delivery.
This will provide you with a plotted history of the evaluation field so you feel more comfortable engaging in deeper-dive topics over coming days. The session is grounded in theory, drawing on leading thinkers and methods that are central to our practice.
Key concepts to be covered include: what is evaluation? why should we evaluate? what can be evaluated? when to evaluate? how to evaluate? where can I learn more about evaluation?
The forum will help many brave young and emerging evaluators to navigate through often choppy evaluation waters so they don't feel 'all at sea' over coming days.

Authors: Kathleen Stacey (beyond...Kathleen Stacey & Associates Pty Ltd), Cheryl Augustsson (Yorgum Healing Services), Raelene Rosas (NT Stolen Generation Aboriginal Corporation), Pat Thompson (Link-Up (Qld) Aboriginal Corporation), Jamie Sampson (Link-Up (NSW) Aboriginal Corporation)

Link-Up Services support Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who were forcibly removed, fostered or adopted from their families as children, and their descendants who live with the ongoing impact of forcible removal policies, to reconnect with family, community, culture and Country. Wayfinding is at the core of our work - navigating unfamiliar territory with clients towards a hoped for destination of a greater sense of 'home', wherever this is possible, in a culturally safe, appropriate and trauma-informed manner.

In 2019, the National Indigenous Australians Agency funded development of a national Link-Up monitoring and evaluation strategy with the eight Link-Up Services operate across six jurisdictions. Each Link-Up Service is either a stand-alone Aboriginal community controlled organisations or based in an Aboriginal community controlled organisation.

This interactive workshop invites participants into our collective experiences of co-creating and implementing the M&E Strategy on a national basis, presented from the voices and position of Link-Up Services. We believe our experiences and learnings will be instructive for monitoring and evaluation activity with other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations and programs.

Travel with us in reflecting on our monitoring and evaluation wayfinding journey over three phases of work. Pause with us at key points throughout the session to exercise your critical self-reflection and analysis skills, share your ideas and learn what has worked well or presented challenges for us and why in creating, navigating and implementing a culturally safe monitoring and evaluation strategy in a complex and demanding service context.

Authors: Matt Healey (First Person Consulting)

The Design and Evaluation Special Interest Group (DESIG) was established in 2017. Its primary aim has been to explore the intersection of evaluation and design, and that aim has been interpreted in different ways over time. In 2024, the DESIG identified an opportunity to take the SIG model in a slightly different direction, embarking on an innovative venture with the launch of the Evaluation Lab, an initiative aimed at talk into action, and taking evaluators through a design process to address evaluation challenges.
Drawing inspiration from the concept of 'living labs,' which serve as real-world testing grounds, the Evaluation Lab created a space where evaluation professionals could come together. Employing a design-thinking process, the Lab guided participants through a structured expedition of defining, ideating, and prototyping solutions to tackle nominated challenges. Participants also learned pitch skills to communicate their solutions.
This Big Room Session provides an opportunity for the DESIG to outline the Evaluation Lab model, capped off with participants presenting their solutions through rapid-fire pitches, either live or pre-recorded, akin to explorers sharing tales of new lands discovered. The session's innovative twist lies in the audience's role, acting as both audience and judges. The audience will vote on their favourite solution, and be involved in crowing the first AES Evaluation Lab winner.
By blending lecture-style content with dynamic team presentations and active audience engagement, the Big Room Session not only highlights the critical role of design in navigating evaluation challenges but also demonstrates the practical application of these methodologies in charting a course through real-world problems.

Authors: Eleanor Williams (Australian Department of Treasury ),Josephine Norman (Victorian Department of Health, AU),Melissa Kaltner (Lumenia, AU),Skye Trudgett (Kowa Collaboration, AU),George Argyrous (Paul Ramsay Foundation, AU),Luke Craven (National Centre for Place-Based Collaboration (Nexus), AU)

Delivering great evaluations requires a strong professional relationship between those commissioning and delivering the evaluation, as well as all relevant stakeholders.

Traditional evaluation commissioning approaches have tended to treat evaluation as a one-off exchange focusing on the completion of pre-defined tasks. However, the evolving landscape of policies and programs tackling complex issues demands a more nuanced and relational approach to get the most out of the journey of evaluation.

This big room panel session brings together speakers who are at the forefront of thinking around collaborative commissioning partnerships from the perspectives of government, not-for-profit and Indigenous-led organisations, and the private sector who can play the full suite of roles on the commissioning journey. The discussion will delve into the experiences of a range of organisations involved in commissioning who are seeking to build enduring relationships, and in some case partnerships, between the commissioners, the evaluators and the stakeholders to whom we are accountable.

Drawing on real-world case studies and empirical evidence, the discussion will highlight the challenges and rewards of transitioning from a transactional model to a relational model. It will explore how this paradigm shift can enhance collaboration and ultimately lead to a range of positive outcomes.

Attendees will be invited to respond to engage in dialogue with the panel to bring the collective wisdom of attendees together and consider how the destination of better commissioning relationships would look, the practical obstacle we face on our pathway, and how we can reach our destination. To facilitate this active discussion, attendees will have the opportunity to use Sli.do throughout the session to provide input on key questions, share experience in real-time and ask questions of the expert panel.

Authors: Moderator:  Prof Rick Cummings, Emeritus Professor Murdoch University, AES Fellow
Key Speaker: Eleanor Williams, Managing Director, Australian Centre for Evaluation
Panelists: Prof Lisa Cameron, Professional Research Fellow, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne
Dr Wendy Jarvie, Adjunct Professor, Public Service Research Group, University of NSW
Bruce Cunningham, Assistant Secretary, Employment Evaluation Branch, Commonwealth Department of Employment and Workplace Relations
Commentators: Prof Patricia Rogers, Former Professor of Public Sector Evaluation, RMIT University, AES Fellow
Scott Bayley, Principal, Scott Bayley Evaluation Service, AES Fellow

The Commonwealth Government has established the Australian Centre for Evaluation (ACE) to put evaluation evidence at the heart of policy design and decision-making by improving the volume, quality, and use of evaluation evidence to support better policy and programs that improve the lives of Australians. This aligns well with the aim of the AES to improve the theory, practice and use of evaluation for people involved in evaluation. The creation of ACE provides an excellent opportunity for the AES and its members to work with a government agency on our common purposes. This collaboration has already commenced through shared activities and, in particular, the involvement of the responsible Minister, Dr Andrew Leigh, as a keynote speaker at the 2023 AES Conference.

An area that has attracted considerable attention is the mandate for ACE to include randomised control trials (RCTs) in at least some of their evaluation studies of Commonwealth programs. This issue was the central topic of Minister Leigh’s keynote address and created considerable debate and discussion at the conference. This demonstrates that this is a topic of importance for the AES and its members.

The aim of the session is to explore the appropriate use of RCTs in evaluation studies of public policy in Australia. The strategy is to commence a communication process on this key topic between ACE and the evaluation community as represented by the AES. Ideally, this will lead to collaboration between ACE and the AES to improve evaluation practice in Australia.

The Fellows Forum session will commence with a prepared presentation by a senior staff member of ACE explaining its mandate and outlining its approach to including RCTs in evaluation studies. This will be followed by a panel of evaluators who have experience with RCTs to explain how they included RCTs in an evaluation study or where they chose not to include an RCT and the reasons why. They will also explore what they learned from this experience to inform their future evaluation practice. Finally, one or two Fellows will act as discussants, responding to the previous presentations with their thoughts on this issue. The session will be moderated by a Fellow and there will be time for audience members to ask questions of the panel members and discussants.

Moderator:  Prof Rick Cummings, Emeritus Professor Murdoch University, AES Fellow
Key Speaker: Eleanor Williams, Managing Director, Australian Centre for Evaluation
Panelists:  Prof Lisa Cameron, Professional Research Fellow, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne
                       Dr Wendy Jarvie, Adjunct Professor, Public Service Research Group, University of NSW
                       Bruce Cunningham, Assistant Secretary, Employment Evaluation Branch, Commonwealth Department of Employment and Workplace Relations
Commentators:  Prof Patricia Rogers, Former Professor of Public Sector Evaluation, RMIT University, AES Fellow
Scott Bayley, Principal, Scott Bayley Evaluation Service, AES Fellow

Authors: Julian King (Julian King & Associates Limited), Adrian Field (Dovetail Consulting Limited, NZ)

Evaluation rubrics are increasingly used to help make evaluative reasoning explicit. Rubrics can also be used as wayfinding tools to help stakeholders understand and participate meaningfully in evaluation. Developing rubrics is conceptually challenging work and the search is on for additional navigation tools and models that might help ease the cognitive load.

As a preliminary step toward rubric development it is often helpful to co-create a theory of change, proposing a chain of causality from actions to impacts, documenting a shared understanding of a program, and providing a point of reference for scoping a logical, coherent set of criteria.

However, it's easy to become disoriented when getting from a theory of change to a set of criteria, because the former deals with impact and the latter with value. Implicitly, a theory of change may focus on activities and impacts that people value, but this cannot be taken for granted - and we argue that value should be made more explicit in program theories.

Specifying a program's value proposition can improve wayfinding between a theory of change and a set of criteria, addressing the aspects of performance and value that matter to stakeholders. Defining a value proposition prompts us to think differently about a program. For example, in addition to what's already in the theory of change, we need to consider to whom the program is valuable, in what ways it is valuable, and how the value is created.

In this presentation, we will share what we've learnt about developing and using value propositions. We'll share a simple framework for developing a value proposition and, using roving microphones, engage participants in co-developing a value proposition in real time. We'll conclude the session by sharing some examples of value propositions from recent evaluations.